| Thông tin của MathewSyme |
| Tham gia: |
06-09-2022 |
| Lần đăng nhập mới nhất: |
08-11-2022, 02:33 PM |
| Tổng bài viết: |
0 (0 bài viết mỗi ngày | 0 % trong tổng số bài viết)
(Bài viết thành viên này)
|
|
0 ()
(Chủ đề thành viên này)
|
| Thời gian duyệt: |
5 Giây |
| Người giới thiệu: |
0 |
|
|
| Thông tin cá nhân của MathewSyme |
| Sex: |
Other |
| Location: |
San Martino In Strada |
| Bio: |
donwload site
When compared to following clouds, media playback in mobile
environments is advantageous. Especially regarding videos, the next cloud needs to be downloaded
all together, while streaming. Merely to stream! I have to install another app again. Cloud
alone is not enough to stream.
Faster than the next cloud. About 20%.
Once you open a document with a cloud viewer, it breaks less than the next cloud (but breaking itself has already been a problem).
Web app is supported. It's rudimentary, but it's possible to
write. However, the problem is that the document format is really a bizarre format,
such as for example .ndoc, that makes it extremely incompatible.
File sharing through the URL (but this is as far as the next cloud is concerned).
Webhard
It has a smaller capacity compared to the next cloud.
Compared to foreign cloud services, it boasts poor service quality.
Compared to the next cloud, it is extremely disadvantageous for
music playback. Continuous streaming can be done only for a few selected sound sources.
Another cloud only must be in a folder.
You need to share a URL which means you can't share music files or videos.
According to the report, there is a saying that N drive looks like an area drive when installed, but only it happens
like a local drive, which is no not the same as the folder synchronization setting.
It's even worse for computers to begin with when external programs play tricks on them.
It's much better to just tidy up the synchronization folder.***
It is extremely specialized in playing music. In particular, it's the only cloud that may play sound sources
in an environment much like MP3 players we are familiar with.
Although each song has some buffering, it seems to play around 192kpbs continuously,
let's assume that communication is in good shape in a 3G environment.
Of course, in reality, it's often take off at that point)
It includes a large capacity. This is a significant advantage when considering domestic cloud services all together, which have poor quality of media access
in cloud services.
You can substitute the finish drive above. In particular, in case a picture is contained in a document,
it really is rarely opened properly.
Streaming songs often cuts off (however, not often)
due to communication problems with the cloud, not
Internet speed problems. Personally i think like it's
about once every two hours. And when you pay attention to high-quality
sound sources, it gets buffered often, or if you are in a
place where in fact the 3G environment isn't smooth, it gets take off more often. So when it's
in that state, you need to discover the path of the
folder where in fact the song was playing and play it again.
The only way to talk about is folder sharing. Only some documents or presentation files are available for file viewing.
Aside from those points, there is nothing to say even if it really is almost a webhard
level.
Foreign Cloud Comparison (Google Drive, Dropbox, Box, Skydrive)
Google Drive
It exerts tremendous power in writing documents.
In particular, even lacking any office program, Google Drive can cover it somewhat.
Not fancy ppts or fancy excels, almost any simple document is OK.
It is advantageous to reflect the progress of work in the mobile environment.
By setting up only offline views, the files you work on can continue to be reflected in the cloud instantly.
It is a very convenient feature for sharing files
with other users.
It is easy to interact with other Google services such
as for example Gmail.
Unless you upload documents directly to the Google drive but write them on the Google drive web
app, the capacity of the file will not account for
cloud storage (what can you mean, if you just use the web app,
the capacity of the Google drive is infinite).
Now, photo media access is strong at the dropbox level.
You can flip through photos and videos could
be played right away. However, the loading time appears to take a little longer compared to the dropbox.
I feel it), nonetheless it doesn't bother me.
There are the most apps that can be connected. In a desktop environment.
Various connection apps allow various operations in the
net environment without installing programs using the pc.
It's a bit of a problem that the app doesn't connect at all on mobile, but it is the best in the
desktop environment.
Upload a little pdf file and change it out to Google Docs format.
It can then be stored again in MS Word format or something.
However, it is only possible with pdf files of 2MB or less.
There is no bandwidth restriction in name.
There's a testimony that it's a block after a lot of writing, but it's not stipulated
by company policy.
If you use Google Docs web app, you can save documents indefinitely, but if you
save them indefinitely, it's the same as once you lose your Internet connection, you're going
to sink and work with MS word, right?)
Google Docs web app, cloud-connected web app, support for editing files
utilizing a variety of programs, nonetheless it is still
crude compared to office programs used on computers.Could it be obvious?)
Dropbox
It exerts its strongest power in media viewing. Photo folders?
Could be flipped smoothly (Domestic cloud services need a certain amount of buffering time for every photo).
However, in the event that you wait a little bit for the dropbox, the
photos in one folder are loaded entirely. While considering Photo A, Photo B is
loaded and scrolling can be done without any blockage.
Video? Beyond streaming, you can freely specify until the start of playback.
It is the best in the world when it comes to media reading.
There are various method of increasing capacity. Camera upload settings,
invitation of friends, events at the business
level, etc.
The speed is relatively good. It is a lot faster compared to
the Box and doesn't work with Google Drive.
The file capacity limit that can be uploaded from a
free account is the largest. 300MB.
The bandwidth of the free account is larger than that of the Box.
It really is updated by 20GB per day. It's practically infinite unless you're going to share large files.
The starting capacity may be the smallest. Two gigabytes of dirt.
Price compared to capacity is the priciest cloud service.
Dirty bastards...
You will find a saying that changes in documents can't be reflected instantly when working on documents.
Word documents shouldn't flip different files like picture documents.
The dropbox itself cannot be documented.
There are probably the most compatible apps in the mobile environment.
To be able to work on a document, you can choose the interface you need through the app
drive and work on it leisurely.
In the case of document files, simple document inquiry is a convenient axis because previews are provided.
Unlike additional.dropboxes, if there are multiple Word documents in a folder, Word documents can even be flipped over the file or file, as is seen in the photo file.
File sharing support is fairly good. This box allows anyone who manages or creates
a web page to talk about data conveniently with little usage of
the web page's resources. However, the bandwidth of the free account is
10GB per month, which is quite small.
Slow. Not paid people.
Media access is quite disadvantageous. It's a whole lot worse than Google Drive, which says it's disadvantageous above.
It's easier to just do it on a computer than pay attention to it for a test.
The uploadable file capacity limit is the smallest.
100MB. Free account only.
In a mobile environment, real-time documentation is rarely supported.
Unless you install Boxeditor, the documentation will be written with an extension that
can only be written on Box (it works, so it's better than Dropbox, but it's significantly less than Google Drive).
It was recently updated (on 22 February?). Media access is currently quite convenient.
Especially photo files. However the pace is still a bit slow.***
Skydrive
The writing function is very powerful. Many cloud services offer Web apps.
But Skydrive's may be the most like the MS office documenting environment we've often used.
And there's also the most supported handwriting, though it is four-legged.
The basic capacity is quite good. 7GB. Well,
it's not that strong a difference.
It is no exaggeration to say that the interface of mobile apps is
the most backward cloud service ever. |
|
